Ubicación: Global + English
Global Global Algérie Français Algeria English Angola Português Angola English Argentina Español Argentina English Australia English Austria Deutsch Austria English Azerbaijan English Azerbaijan Русский Bahrain English Bangladesh English Belgium English Belgium Français Belgium Nederlands Brazil Português Brazil English Bulgaria български Bulgaria English Cameroon English Cameroon Français Canada English Canada Français Chile Español Chile English China 中文 China 日本語 China English Colombia Español Colombia English Croatia English Czech Republic Čeština Czech Republic English Denmark English Djibouti English Ecuador Español Ecuador English Egypt English Estonia English Ethiopia English Finland Suomi Finland English France Français France English Georgia English Georgia Русский Germany Deutsch Germany English Ghana English Greece Ελληνικά Greece English Guatemala Español Guatemala English Hong Kong, China English Hong Kong, China 中文 Hungary Magyar Hungary English India English Indonesia English Iraq English Ireland English Italy Italiano Italy English Ivory Coast Français Ivory Coast English Japan 日本語 Japan English Jordan English Kazakhstan Русский Kazakhstan English Kenya English Kuwait English Kyrgyzstan Русский Kyrgyzstan English Latvia English Lithuania English Malaysia English Mauritius English Mauritius français (Maurice) Mexico Español Mexico English Moldova Română Moldova English Mongolia English Morocco English Morocco Français Mozambique Português Mozambique English Netherlands Nederlands Netherlands English New Zealand English Nigeria English Norway English Oman English Pakistan English Paraguay Español Paraguay English Peru Español Peru English Philippines English Poland Polski Poland English Portugal Português Portugal English Qatar English Republic of Korea 한국어 Republic of Korea English Romania Română Romania English Saudi Arabia English Serbia Српски Serbia English Singapore English Slovakia English Slovenia English South Africa English Spain English Spain Español Sri Lanka English Sweden English Switzerland Deutsch Switzerland Français Switzerland Italiano Switzerland English Tanzania English Thailand ไทย Thailand English Togo English Togo Français Tunisia English Tunisia Français Türkiye Türkçe Türkiye English Turkmenistan Русский Turkmenistan English Ukraine Українська Ukraine English United Arab Emirates English United Kingdom English Uruguay Español Uruguay English USA English Uzbekistan English Uzbekistan Русский Vietnam Tiếng Việt Vietnam English

Solid waste leaching toxicity testing by the roll-over (flip) extraction method, specified in GB 5086.1-1996, measures the hazardous constituents that a waste releases when it is tumbled end-over-end in reagent water under dynamic agitation. Accredited third-party laboratories apply this procedure to support hazardous waste identification, solid waste classification, disposal acceptance, and environmental compliance decision-making. This article explains the technical principle, applicable sample types, target analytes, step-by-step test procedure, quality control requirements, applications, and frequently asked questions.

Technical Overview

The roll-over (flip) extraction method is a laboratory leaching procedure defined in GB 5086.1-1996, Solid Waste – Extraction Procedure for Leaching Toxicity – Roll-Over Leaching Method. The test quantifies the concentration of toxic constituents that migrate from a solid waste into water when the waste is subjected to prolonged, vigorous, end-over-end agitation, and it is one of the foundational procedures used in China for evaluating the leaching behavior of solid waste.

The tumbling action simulates relatively dynamic waste-water contact scenarios, such as transport, handling, storage under rainfall, or disposal conditions in which waste is periodically rolled and wetted. Because the extractant is unacidified reagent water and no pH adjustment is performed, the method reflects constituent release under neutral, water-dominated exposure conditions rather than acidic or buffered attack.

The leachate obtained from the extraction is analyzed using the methods of the GB/T 15555 series or the analytical procedures cited in GB 5085.3-2007, and the resulting concentrations are compared with the leaching toxicity identification limits to determine whether the waste exhibits hazardous leaching characteristics. The roll-over method belongs to a family of complementary extraction procedures that also includes the horizontal vibration method (HJ 557-2010), the sulphuric-nitric acid method (HJ/T 299-2007), and the acetic acid buffer method (HJ/T 300-2007). Internationally comparable procedures include US EPA Method 1311 (TCLP), which uses the same 18-hour tumbling regime, the EN 12457 series of batch leaching tests, and ASTM D3987 water shake extraction.

Testing Samples

Industrial Sludge and Treatment Residues

Electroplating and surface-treatment sludge, pickling waste, oily sludge, chemical and pharmaceutical wastewater sludge, flocculation and precipitation residues, spent filter media, and spent activated carbon are commonly submitted for roll-over leaching assessment because they frequently contain elevated metals or organic contaminants.

Incineration and Thermal Treatment Residues

Municipal and hazardous waste incineration fly ash, bottom ash, boiler dust, melting furnace slag, and flue gas cleaning residues are routinely tested, as these materials can release heavy metals, salts, and trace organics upon contact with water.

Mining and Metallurgical Waste

Tailings, smelting slag, foundry sand, grinding and polishing residues, red mud, phosphogypsum, and other byproduct gypsums are evaluated to characterize metal and anion release under water-contact conditions.

Contaminated Soil and Sediment

Soil from contaminated sites, river and lake sediment, dredged material, suspect backfill, and solidified or stabilized waste forms can be tested to support site investigation, remediation design, and verification of treatment effectiveness.

Chemical and Manufacturing Solid Waste

Waste salts, spent catalysts and adsorbents, paint and resin waste, distillation and reaction residues, electrode and battery scrap, and demolition waste suspected of contamination are also within the scope of the method.

Testing Items

The target analytes are selected according to the waste source, the regulatory question, and the identification limits of GB 5085.3-2007. Typical testing items include:

Inorganic Analytes

  • Heavy metals: copper, zinc, lead, cadmium, nickel, total chromium, hexavalent chromium, total mercury, and alkylmercury
  • Other metals and metalloids: beryllium, barium, total silver, arsenic, selenium, antimony, vanadium, manganese, cobalt, and thallium
  • Other inorganic species: fluoride and cyanide, including easily liberatable cyanide

Organic Analytes

  • Volatile organic compounds: benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, vinyl chloride, dichloromethane, chloroform, carbon tetrachloride, trichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene, and 1,2-dichloroethane
  • Semi-volatile organic compounds: phenol, nitrobenzene, monochloronitrobenzenes, 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene, pentachlorophenol, phthalate esters, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
  • Other organic parameters: organophosphorus pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls, and petroleum hydrocarbons where relevant

Leachate Characterization Parameters

pH, electrical conductivity, and oxidation-reduction potential of the leachate are typically recorded, as they strongly influence constituent solubility and support the interpretation of analytical results.

Testing Methods

Sample Collection and Preparation

Samples are collected in accordance with HJ/T 20-1998 technical specifications for solid waste sampling, using appropriate containers and preservation measures to prevent volatilization, contamination, and moisture change. In the laboratory, the sample is air-dried or dried at low temperature, crushed and ground, and sieved to a particle size of 5 mm or finer. The moisture content is determined so that the extraction charge can be weighed on a dry-mass basis.

Extraction Procedure According to GB 5086.1-1996

  • Weigh 70 g of the prepared sample, on a dry-mass basis, into a 1 L wide-mouth extraction bottle, using polyethylene bottles for inorganic analysis and glass bottles where organic analytes are targeted
  • Add 700 mL of reagent water to achieve a liquid-to-solid ratio of 10:1
  • Seal the bottle, fix it on the roll-over device, and tumble at 30 ± 2 r/min for 18 ± 2 hours at ambient laboratory temperature
  • After tumbling, allow the solids to settle briefly, then record leachate pH and conductivity as required
  • Separate the liquid phase by filtration through a 0.45 µm membrane filter to obtain the analytical leachate

Preservation and Instrumental Analysis

The leachate is preserved according to the requirements of each analyte, for example acidification with nitric acid for metals, alkaline preservation for cyanide, and refrigeration in sealed vials for volatile organics. Metals are determined by inductively coupled plasma optical emission or mass spectrometry and atomic absorption spectrometry, with cold vapor and hydride generation techniques for mercury and hydride-forming elements. Hexavalent chromium is measured spectrophotometrically, fluoride by ion chromatography or spectrophotometry, cyanide by spectrophotometry or flow injection analysis, and organic compounds by headspace gas chromatography and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, following the GB/T 15555 series, the methods cited in GB 5085.3-2007, or equivalent ISO, ASTM, and US EPA procedures.

Quality Assurance and Quality Control

Accredited third-party laboratories perform method blanks, reagent blanks, duplicate extractions, matrix spikes, calibration verification, and holding-time checks, and apply relative deviation criteria for duplicate leachate results. Complete chain-of-custody documentation, standardized pre-treatment, and instrument performance verification ensure that the data are legally defensible and technically comparable between laboratories.

Result Evaluation

Leachate concentrations are compared against the leaching toxicity identification limits in GB 5085.3-2007. If the concentration of any regulated constituent exceeds its limit, the waste is considered to exhibit leaching toxicity characteristics. It should be noted that, since 2007, formal hazardous waste identification for leaching toxicity in China is performed using the sulphuric-nitric acid method (HJ/T 299-2007), while the roll-over method continues to be applied to water-contact scenarios, general industrial solid waste classification under GB 18599, legacy data comparison, and specialized engineering evaluations. Accredited laboratories advise on the correct method selection for each regulatory purpose.

Applications

  • Hazardous waste screening and characterization supporting classification under the National Hazardous Waste List
  • General industrial solid waste classification and compliance evaluation for storage and disposal facilities
  • Disposal acceptance testing for landfill, co-processing, and comprehensive utilization pathways
  • Environmental impact assessment and permitting for waste treatment and disposal projects
  • Contaminated site investigation, remediation design, and solidification or stabilization performance verification
  • Corporate environmental management, pollutant discharge permitting, waste audit, and due diligence
  • Environmental emergency response, litigation support, and forensic characterization of unknown waste
  • Research studies on leaching behavior, long-term release modeling, and treatment technology development

FAQ

What is the difference between the roll-over method and the horizontal vibration method?

Both procedures extract with reagent water at a liquid-to-solid ratio of 10:1. The roll-over method tumbles the sealed bottle end-over-end at 30 r/min for about 18 hours, representing vigorous rolling contact, whereas the horizontal vibration method (HJ 557-2010) agitates the sample on a reciprocating shaker for about 8 hours followed by a 16-hour standing period, representing static immersion and percolation under surface water contact. The choice depends on the exposure scenario being simulated.

Which extraction method is used for hazardous waste identification?

Under GB 5085.3-2007, leaching toxicity identification is performed with the sulphuric-nitric acid method (HJ/T 299-2007). Waste entering municipal solid waste landfills is generally evaluated with the acetic acid buffer method (HJ/T 300-2007) per GB 16889. The roll-over method remains relevant for water-contact scenarios, general industrial solid waste classification, legacy comparisons, and scenario-specific studies.

How much sample is required for the test?

A minimum of about 1 kg is normally required, and 2 to 5 kg is recommended. This allows for drying, crushing, sieving, moisture determination, replicate extractions of 70 g each, and possible retesting or additional analytes.

How long does the roll-over leaching test take?

The extraction itself requires approximately 18 hours of tumbling plus settling and filtration time. Including pre-treatment and instrumental analysis, inorganic parameters are typically reported within 3 to 5 working days, organic parameters within 5 to 10 working days, and a complete report is generally issued within one to two weeks.

How are the results interpreted?

Measured leachate concentrations are compared with the leaching toxicity limits of GB 5085.3-2007. Exceedance of any limit indicates that the waste possesses leaching toxicity characteristics, which has direct consequences for its classification, transport, storage, and disposal requirements. Professional interpretation by accredited laboratory engineers is recommended, since sampling representativeness and method applicability strongly affect conclusions.